Credits
A special thanks goes to AT&T-Allentown’s ESD Committee members, Will MacFarland (AT&T-Denver), Dennis Belliet, Reggie Fink and Michael Bodnar (AT&T-Allentown) for their technical input and support of this study.
i Fowler, S.L., “Triboelectricity and Surface Resistivity Do No Correlate”, EOS/ESD Symposium
Proceedings, 1998.ii Brandt, M. T, and Halperin, S.A., “A proposed Test Methodology for Floor Materials,” EOS/ESD Technology Int’l, August/September, 1991 & October/November, 1991.
iii Fowler, S.L. and Klein, W.G., “Static Phenomena and Test Methods for Static Controlled Floors,” EOS/ESD Symposium Proceedings, 1992.
iv EOS/ESD-DS7.2, DS7.1, EOS/ESD Association Standards, EOS/ESD Association, 200 Liberty Plaza, Rome, NY 13440.
v ASTM Stds D257, D4078, D3714, D2047-69, D1044, and F150, American Standards for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race St. Philadelphia, Pa. 19103.
vi UL Std 779, Underwriters Laboratories, 333 Pfingsten Rd. Northbrook, Ill 60062.
vii NFPA 99, National Fire Protection Assn, 60 Batterymarch St., Boston, MA 02110.
viii FTS 101C, Method 4046, Federal Supply Service, General Services Administration, Washington, DC.
ix Freeman, P.S. & Moss, R.Y., Hewlett-Packard, “Sources of Error in Resistance Measurements on Conductive Flooring”, 1991 EOS/ESD Symposium Proceedings.
x Chase, E.W. and Unger, B.A., “Triboelectric Charging of Personnel from Walking on Tile Floors,” 1986 EOS/ESD Symposium Proceedings.
AT&T ESD Flooring Engineering Evaluation Home
Introduction | Experiment Overview | Procedures | Results | Economics | Summary | Conclusion | Credits
